Disability disclosure has implications for student experience and graduate outcomes, yet little is known about disclosure in land-based higher education, a sector with distinctive vocational and practical provision. Using aggregated Higher Education Statistics Agency data on first-year enrolments (2015/16–2024/25; 88,430 full-person equivalents [FPEs]) and the Graduate Outcomes Survey (academic years 2017/18–2022/23; 31,275 FPEs eligible graduates, of whom 17,840 FPEs responded), this study examined disclosure patterns and their association with student characteristics and graduate employment, using design-based chi-squared tests and logistic regression with standard errors clustered by provider. Disclosure increased over the period (unadjusted OR for 2024/25 vs. 2015/16 = 2.30, 95% CI 1.92–2.77). Rates were similar in veterinary sciences (18.1%) and agriculture, food and related studies (18.2%). After adjustment, male (OR = 0.81), UK Asian (OR = 0.71) and non-UK-domiciled students (OR = 0.51) had lower odds of disclosure than female and UK White students, whereas male students of Mixed ethnicity had higher odds than UK White female students (OR = 1.31, 95% CI 1.04–1.64). Among survey respondents, the employment rate of graduates with a known disability was 4.9 percentage points lower than that of graduates without (76.6% vs. 81.5%), and 3.6 percentage points lower after adjustment (95% CI 2.0–5.2). As the first sector-level analysis of disability disclosure in land-based higher education, the study shows that disclosure is associated with demographic, institutional and subject characteristics and that, among survey respondents, graduates with a known disability have lower employment rates, highlighting the need for targeted support.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ugwu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: