Individuals with depressive tendencies may categorize ambiguous facial expressions toward negative rather than happy endpoints, but the associated decision-process components remained unclear. The study examined whether the categorization shift was associated with differences in perceptual criterion, discrimination sensitivity, response dynamics, or diffusion-model parameters. Fifty-nine participants, comprising a depressive tendency group and a comparison group, categorized morphed Sad–Happy and Angry–Happy expressions presented in a 750-ms face/mask sequence or a 1500-ms face/no-mask sequence. Psychometric functions, area-under-the-curve (AUC) analyses, quadratic mixed-effects models of response time, and a hierarchical drift–diffusion model were applied. Across conditions, the depressive tendency group showed lower points of subjective equality than the comparison group, indicating a relative shift in the categorization boundary toward the negative versus happy endpoint, without a corresponding group difference in discrimination sensitivity. AUC analyses similarly indicated higher negative-response probabilities in the depressive tendency group, particularly within the low-negativity portion of the continuum. Condition-specific patterns were observed, but direct tests did not support a larger Sad–Happy group difference in the 1500-ms than in the 750-ms presentation sequence. In the focal Sad–Happy 1500-ms face/no-mask sequence, the selected drift–diffusion model indicated a group-related drift-criterion shift toward the Sad boundary and modestly longer non-decision time in the depressive tendency group, whereas starting-point bias and boundary separation did not differ between groups. These findings are consistent with a relative categorization shift toward negative versus Happy facial-expression endpoints among participants with depressive tendencies. The diffusion-model results provided a model-dependent account of the focal choice–response-time pattern under the present presentation-sequence structure.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: