Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Positive climatic moisture deficit (CMD+) characterizes the seasonal imbalance between precipitation supply and atmospheric water demand, yet its spatial heterogeneity and associations with environmental and human-related factors remain insufficiently understood. Taking Anyang, China, as a case study, we calculated annual CMD+ for 2000–2020 using 1 km monthly precipitation and potential evapotranspiration data and applied an extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost)–SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) framework to the corresponding long-term mean fields to examine climatological spatial heterogeneity. Five predictors were considered, including elevation, normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI), irrigation fraction, built-up fraction, and population density. Nested spatial-block cross-validation showed good model generalization. Long-term mean CMD+ was generally lower in the western mountainous area and higher across the central and eastern plains. The digital elevation model (DEM) accounted for 66.10% of the normalized mean absolute SHAP importance, followed by NDVI (13.47%) and irrigation fraction (9.72%). A DEM-excluded sensitivity model retained a spatial cross-validated R2 of 0.781, compared with 0.898 for the full model. SHAP dependence analysis revealed pronounced nonlinear responses, with primary local model response transition points at approximately 297.1 m for DEM, 0.812 for NDVI, and 23.1% for irrigation fraction. The strongest pairwise SHAP interaction occurred between NDVI and irrigation fraction, accounting for 21.87% of total pairwise interaction strength. These results show that the spatial heterogeneity of CMD+ in Anyang is closely associated with topographic background, while vegetation status and irrigated agriculture provide additional nonlinear and interactive explanatory information. The identified spatial patterns and model-response transitions provide spatial information for understanding regional climatic moisture deficits and for subsequent sustainable water resource assessment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Li et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: