Background/Objectives: To provide an updated overview of adrenal incidentaloma evaluation, characterize the principal imaging mimics across pediatric and adult populations, and propose a clinically actionable approach integrating endocrine assessment with conventional and advanced imaging. Methods: A narrative review of recent evidence and major international recommendations was performed, focusing on epidemiology, endocrine work-up, non-contrast computed tomography (CT), washout CT, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and dual-energy CT (DECT). Results: The recent literature has questioned a uniformly washout-centered approach and has raised interest in more selective, risk-adapted strategies based on clinical context, endocrine profile, and lesion phenotype; however, these proposals should be distinguished from established guideline recommendations. Non-contrast CT remains the cornerstone of first-line characterization, particularly for identifying lipid-rich adenomas. However, the routine use of adrenal washout CT is increasingly questioned, especially in true incidentalomas, because many benign adenomas are lipid-poor and several non-adenomatous lesions may show overlapping washout behavior. In this setting, MRI maintains a key problem-solving role, mainly through chemical shift imaging. DECT represents the most promising technical advance, enabling multiparametric characterization through virtual non-contrast images, iodine quantification, and material decomposition, with the potential to improve the assessment of indeterminate lesions while reducing unnecessary multiphasic imaging and radiation exposure. Conclusions: Current management should remain grounded in established guideline recommendations. MRI may be selectively used as a problem-solving modality, while DECT and emerging strategies require further validation before they can be considered standards of care.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tiralongo et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: