Remote epitaxy on graphene offers a route to overcome lattice-mismatch constraints and enable the exfoliation of functional semiconductor layers. Metastable κ -Ga 2 O 3 films were grown by pulsed laser deposition on wet-transferred graphene (TGR) covering α -Al 2 O 3 , GaN, and AlN templates and on directly grown graphene (DGR) on sapphire. The films were compared to assess how the graphene interface affects film growth. X-ray diffraction revealed only κ -Ga 2 O 3 reflections and showed that the films maintained in-plane alignment with their respective substrates regardless of graphene type. However, films grown on TGR exhibited dense needle-shaped defects and root-mean-square (RMS) roughness exceeding 70 nm. Transfer-related surface features covered 12–16% of the TGR surfaces, compared with 0.8% of the DGR surface. These features may serve as heterogeneous nucleation sites, promoting Volmer–Weber island growth while preserving crystallographic orientation. In contrast, DGR preserved the substrate step–terrace structure and supported two-dimensional growth. Films grown on DGR had smooth surfaces (RMS ≈ 4.3 nm) and crystalline quality comparable to that of films grown directly on bare templates. Interfacial quality, primarily the absence of transfer-related residues and potentially the crystallographic order of DGR, appears to govern film morphology more strongly than the mere presence of graphene. Thus, DGR offers a promising platform for the epitaxial growth of smooth, metastable oxide films on graphene.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Min et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: