Large language model (LLM) serving platforms increasingly route requests across heterogeneous backends, transforming query routing from a model-selection task into a system-level load-balancing problem. Centralized routers can become throughput bottlenecks and single points of failure as deployment scale and request volume grow. Distributed routing mitigates these limitations, but it introduces a coupled min–max optimization problem in which multiple routers jointly determine peak backend utilization. This coupling makes routing optimization challenging under dynamic workload conditions. We propose LODAR, a layered optimization framework for distributed LLM routing. LODAR formulates routing as a distributed min–max load-balancing problem and optimizes routing logits directly through robust offline evolutionary search, router-level block-coordinate refinement, and lightweight online adaptation. This design does not require gradient-based credit assignment, yet exploits router-level structure and warm-start information across workload windows. Experiments on synthetic and WildChat-derived trace workloads cover three deployment scales, complemented by evaluation on a real heterogeneous multi-GPU testbed. In the scale-aggregated main comparisons, LODAR achieves the lowest MaxLoad and LoadStd under both workload settings. In trace-driven simulation, LODAR reduces MaxLoad by 16.9% and LoadStd by 40.3% relative to DE, the strongest evolutionary baseline in the simulation comparison. The simulation-optimized LODAR base routing table transfers directly to the physical deployment without deployment-specific offline retraining or tuning. In the real multi-GPU experiments, LODAR reduces MaxLoad by 4.7% and LoadStd by 14.9% relative to CMA-ES. These results demonstrate the effectiveness of LODAR’s layered optimization strategy for distributed load balancing in heterogeneous LLM serving systems.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Xi et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: