English translation of “Inquisitio physica in causam fluxus ac refluxus maris” (Eneström E057), titled “A physical inquiry into the cause of the ebb and flow of the sea.” Attribution: Leonhard Euler. This PDF includes the complete original text, pp. 235–350, and all sixteen scientific figures, reproduced from the identified 1760 comparison witness. Prepared for Open Math Heritage with OpenAI-assisted translation, mathematical transcription and LaTeX typesetting. OMH v1.0 is a machine-assisted draft that has undergone a full, fresh independent AI-assisted technical audit of source coverage, translation, formulas, tables and figures where present, and rendered output. This is not a claim of human scholarly review or certification of the historical mathematics. Version 2 is reserved for a fully reviewed edition. Original publication: Paris Academy prize essay for 1740, published 1741, pp. 235–350, with four separate plate leaves. Sources: https://scholarlycommons.pacific.edu/euler-works/57/; https://archive.org/details/b30414167_0003. The figure reproductions come from the Wellcome Library 1760 reprint, whose source-specific metadata carries the Public Domain Mark. The original Pacific scan’s free/open-access statement is not treated as an image-reuse license. Figure-label differences between the witnesses are documented. The historical original is public domain by age; no publication license is assigned here to the new translation or editorial notes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Vaibhav Shakya (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: