Key result
Atenolol is linked to ~10.5-fold higher reporting of bradycardia in FAERS.
Why the study?
Beta-blockers are widely prescribed for cardiovascular indications, but their real-world cardiovascular adverse-event profiles across drug generations remain incompletely characterised in large pharmacovigilance datasets.
What are the cardiovascular adverse event reporting patterns and safety signals for atenolol, bisoprolol, and nebivolol in the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System?
Observational (n=16,320,000)
What are the cardiovascular adverse event reporting patterns and safety signals for atenolol, bisoprolol, and nebivolol in the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Disproportionality analysis of the FAERS database reveals distinct cardiovascular adverse event reporting signals across different beta-blockers, highlighting the need for prospective confirmation to inform beta-blocker selection.
Background: Beta-blockers are widely prescribed across cardiovascular indications, yet their real-world cardiovascular adverse-event profiles across drug generations remain incompletely characterised in large pharmacovigilance datasets. Objective: The objective was to describe and compare cardiovascular adverse-event reporting patterns for atenolol, bisoprolol and nebivolol in the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS). Methods: We performed a retrospective disproportionality analysis of FAERS reports using OpenVigil 2.1, covering each drug’s available reporting history from the first quarter of 2004 (2007 for nebivolol) through the third quarter of 2025 (FAERS 2025 Q3). Cardiovascular events were defined as individual MedDRA Preferred Terms; signals were assessed with the Reporting Odds Ratio (ROR, 95% CI) and Information Component (IC) under Evans’ criteria. Individual case safety reports were also analysed for demographics, seriousness and outcomes. Results: Atenolol was most strongly associated with bradycardia (ROR = 10.513), followed by pericardial haemorrhage (ROR = 7.067) and ventricular hypertrophy (ROR = 6.999). Bisoprolol showed the highest signals for diastolic dysfunction (ROR = 24.875), atrial tachycardia (ROR = 23.283) and chronic cardiac failure (ROR = 23.222). Nebivolol had the lowest overall reporting volume, although counts were not adjusted for exposure; its strongest signals were bradycardia (ROR = 9.619) and coronary artery stenosis (ROR = 9.351). Paediatric reports (0–17 years) were uncommon for atenolol and bisoprolol and nearly absent for nebivolol; none of the three is FDA-approved in this group. Reports mainly involved older adults (60–89 years), and a substantial proportion were classified as serious. Conclusions: All three agents generated significant signals across a broad range of cardiovascular events. Nebivolol had the lowest reporting volume, but this should not be interpreted as evidence of a safer profile. Because FAERS disproportionality cannot establish causality, these findings are hypothesis-generating and require prospective confirmation before they can inform beta-blocker selection.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nho et al. (2026) conducted an observational in Cardiovascular adverse events (n=16,320,000). Atenolol, Bisoprolol, Nebivolol vs. All other drugs in the FAERS database was evaluated on Disproportionate reporting of bradycardia with atenolol (ROR 10.513, 95% CI 10.021-11.028). Atenolol was most strongly associated with bradycardia, bisoprolol with diastolic dysfunction, and nebivolol with bradycardia compared to all other drugs in FAERS.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: