Key result
ChatGPT-supported cardiac rehabilitation is linked to ~17-percentage-point higher program compliance than conventional rehab alone.
Why the study?
The effects of ChatGPT use on self-care cardiac rehabilitation adherence in patients with coronary artery disease were unclear.
Does personalized digital support via ChatGPT improve self-care cardiac rehabilitation adherence and physical activity in patients with coronary artery disease?
Cohort (n=96)
Does personalized digital support via ChatGPT improve self-care cardiac rehabilitation adherence and physical activity in patients with coronary artery disease?
Supplementing standard cardiac rehabilitation with personalized AI support via ChatGPT significantly improves program compliance, physical activity levels, and quality of life in patients with coronary artery disease.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May support AI tools for cardiac rehab adherence; hypothesis-generating and requires randomized confirmation before practice change.
OBJECTIVE: To clarify the possible effects of ChatGPT use on self-care cardiac rehabilitation (CR) adherence in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). METHOD: Patients in the ChatGPT group participated in a standard cardiac rehabilitation program supplemented with personalized digital support via ChatGPT (n=48). The control group participated in conventional cardiac rehabilitation only, without AI-based support (n=48). Both groups completed a 6-month structured rehabilitation program supervised by a multidisciplinary team. Baseline demographic and clinical data, patient satisfaction assessed using a Likert scale, physical activity levels assessed using the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ), and metabolic equivalent of task (MET) values were recorded. RESULTS: The postrehabilitation MET score was 1537 in the ChatGPT group and 1413 in the control group (P = 0.001). Similarly, the change in MET score after rehabilitation was greater in the ChatGPT group than in the control group (1029 vs. 875, P = 0.001). SF-36 parameters, including physical functioning, role-physical, mental health, bodily pain, and general health, were significantly higher in the ChatGPT group than in the control group (P < 0.05 for all). Program compliance was higher in the ChatGPT group than in the control group (91.7% vs. 75.0%, P = 0.028). Patient satisfaction was also higher in the ChatGPT group (4.5 vs. 3.8, P = 0.001). CONCLUSION: ChatGPT use during CR was associated with higher patient compliance rates. Moreover, ChatGPT-supported CR was associated with higher physical activity levels, greater patient satisfaction, and better selected quality-of-life scores.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
I et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Coronary artery disease (n=96). Personalized digital support via ChatGPT vs. Conventional cardiac rehabilitation without AI-based support was evaluated on Program compliance (p=0.028). ChatGPT-supported cardiac rehabilitation was associated with higher program compliance compared to conventional rehabilitation alone (91.7% vs. 75.0%, P=0.028).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: