Purpose: To explore the association of anisometropia, strabismus, and amblyopia with autism spectrum disorder (ASD), attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), and their comorbidity. Design: Population-based cross-sectional study. Subjects: Children aged 6-10 years in Hong Kong. Methods: Participants underwent comprehensive ocular examinations. Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder and ASD diagnoses were made by qualified physicians using International Classification of Diseases 10 criteria. Main Outcome Measures: The prevalence of anisometropia, strabismus and amblyopia. Results: A total of 10 936 children were included, comprising 153 (1.4%) with ASD only, 413 (3.8%) with ADHD only, 276 (2.5%) with comorbid ASD–ADHD, and 10 094 (92.3%) healthy controls. The prevalence of anisometropia was 9.8%, 8.7%, 15.2%, and 6.0% across the respective groups ( P < 0.001). The corresponding prevalence of strabismus was 4.6%, 2.9%, 4.0%, and 1.7% ( P < 0.001), and for amblyopia, it was 7.2%, 2.7%, 4.0%, and 2.9% ( P = 0.03). Autism spectrum disorder (ASD only plus comorbidity) was associated with higher risks of anisometropia (odds ratio [OR] = 1.51, P = 0.04), strabismus (OR = 2.30, P = 0.01), and amblyopia (OR = 1.91, P = 0.02), whereas ADHD (ADHD only plus comorbidity) was associated with anisometropia (OR = 1.58, P = 0.008) after adjusting for covariates. In subgroup analyses, the ASD-only group showed associations with strabismus (OR = 2.47, P = 0.04) and amblyopia (OR = 2.46, P = 0.02). The comorbid ASD–ADHD group exhibited a higher risk of anisometropia (OR = 2.17, P < 0.001), whereas children with ADHD only showed no association with the aforementioned ocular disorders. Conclusions: Children with ASD only and ASD–ADHD comorbidity were associated with increased and distinct patterns of anisometropia, strabismus, and amblyopia, while children with ADHD only showed no such association. Financial Disclosure(s): The author has no/the authors have no proprietary or commercial interest in any materials discussed in this article.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chen et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: