Key result
CRT is linked to an absolute ~11-point improvement in systemic RV fractional area of change.
Why the study?
Patients with a systemic right ventricle are at high risk of developing heart failure. This study aimed to evaluate the technical feasibility and hemodynamic benefit of cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with systemic right ventricle and electromechanical dyssynchrony.
Does cardiac resynchronization therapy improve systemic right ventricular function and hemodynamics in patients with a systemic right ventricle and electromechanical dyssynchrony?
Observational (n=8)
Does cardiac resynchronization therapy improve systemic right ventricular function and hemodynamics in patients with a systemic right ventricle and electromechanical dyssynchrony?
Absolute Event Rate: 29.5% vs 18.1%
p-value: p=0.008
Cardiac resynchronization therapy significantly improves electrical synchrony, hemodynamics, and systolic function in patients with a failing systemic right ventricle and electromechanical dyssynchrony.
Objectives This study aimed to evaluate the technical feasibility and hemodynamic benefit of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) in patients with systemic right ventricle (RV). Background Patients with a systemic RV are at high risk of developing heart failure. Cardiac resynchronization therapy may improve RV function in those with electromechanical dyssynchrony. Methods Eight patients (age 6.9 to 29.2 years) with a systemic RV and right bundle-branch block (n = 2) or pacing from the left ventricle (LV) (n = 6) with a QRS interval of 161 +/- 21 ms underwent CRT (associated with cardiac surgery aimed at decrease in tricuspid regurgitation in 3 of 8 patients) and were followed-up for a median of 17.4 months. Results Change from baseline rhythm to CRT was accompanied by a decrease in QRS interval (-28.0%, p = 0.002) and interventricular mechanical delay (-16.7%, p = 0.047) and immediate improvement in the RV filling time (+10.9%, p = 0.002), Tei index (-7.7%, p = 0.008), estimated RV maximum +dP/dt(+45.9%, p = 0.007), aortic velocity-time integral (+7.0%, p = 0.028), and RV ejection fraction by radionuclide ventriculography (+9.6%, p = 0.04). The RV fractional area of change increased from a median of 18.1% before resynchronization to 29.5% at last follow-up (p = 0.008) without a significant change in the end-diastolic area (+4.0%, p = NS). Conclusions The CRT yielded improvement in systemic RV function in patients with spontaneous or LV pacing-induced electromechanical dyssynchrony and seems to be a promising adjunct to the treatment and prevention of systemic RV failure.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Janoušek et al. (2004) conducted an observational in Systemic right ventricle with electromechanical dyssynchrony (n=8). Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) vs. Baseline rhythm prior to resynchronization was evaluated on Right ventricular fractional area of change (p=0.008). Cardiac resynchronization therapy improved systemic RV fractional area of change from 18.1% to 29.5% (p=0.008) and RV ejection fraction by +9.6% (p=0.04).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: