Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Specific absorption rate (SAR) calculation using a computer-aided design (CAD)-based mobile phone model is still a challenging task. Seven international laboratories participated in an interlaboratory comparison of SAR calculations using a CAD-based model of a commercially available dual-band mobile phone. Return loss and peak 10 g average SAR results obtained using six different electromagnetic solvers were compared. Considering the differences in the techniques implemented in the solvers-either time or frequency domain-used for the interlaboratory comparison, overall a good agreement is observed. Proposed as a benchmark, results of the measured return loss and peak 10 g average SAR using the actual mobile phone are also provided.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Monebhurrun et al. (2014) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: