Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
We reconsider the foundations of modal logic, following Martin-Löf's methodology of distinguishing judgments from propositions. We give constructive meaning explanations for necessity and possibility, which yields a simple and uniform system of natural deduction for intuitionistic modal logic that does not exhibit anomalies found in other proposals. We also give a new presentation of lax logic and find that the lax modality is already expressible using possibility and necessity. Through a computational interpretation of proofs in modal logic we further obtain a new formulation of Moggi's monadic metalanguage.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pfenning et al. (2001) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: