The extent to which short-term changes in chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome (CP/CPPS) symptoms and erectile function align remains uncertain. We retrospectively analyzed 122 men with CP/CPPS who reported sexual activity during both questionnaire reference periods and had complete baseline and week-12 National Institutes of Health Chronic Prostatitis Symptom Index (NIH-CPSI) and 5-item International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-5) assessments during usual care. Improvements were defined as baseline minus week-12 NIH-CPSI and week-12 minus baseline IIEF-5. Their continuous association was evaluated using Spearman correlation with 10,000 bootstrap resamples and baseline-adjusted analysis of covariance. Threshold-based classifications were secondary and exploratory. Mean NIH-CPSI and IIEF-5 improvements were 6.0 points (95% CI 5.3 to 6.6) and 1.9 points (95% CI 1.3 to 2.5), respectively. Improvements were modestly correlated (Spearman ρ = 0.32, bootstrap 95% CI 0.14 to 0.48). In the unadjusted improvement-on-improvement model, each 1-point greater NIH-CPSI improvement corresponded to a 0.33-point greater IIEF-5 improvement (95% CI 0.17 to 0.49). In the adjusted analysis of covariance with week-12 IIEF-5 as the outcome, the corresponding coefficient was 0.33 (95% CI 0.16 to 0.51). Among 104 men with baseline IIEF-5-defined erectile dysfunction, 71 (68.3%) remained at or below the cutoff at week 12. Among men with evaluable paired assessments, changes in CP/CPPS symptoms and erectile function were only partially aligned. NIH-CPSI improvement should not be used as a proxy for concurrent erectile-function improvement. Direct assessment of erectile function remains necessary, and the findings should not be interpreted as treatment effects.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: