This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
This study presents a system-level evaluation of onboard energy consumption and loss mechanisms in electrified tractor powertrains under representative agricultural workloads. A baseline diesel tractor model was developed and validated using field-measured moldboard-plowing data, reproducing the principal vehicle-level responses with NRMSE and MAPE values below 5%. Using the field-validated baseline, a series hybrid electric tractor (Ser HEV), fuel cell electric tractor (FCV), and battery electric tractor (BEV) were comparatively evaluated under a tillage duty cycle. Relative to the conventional diesel tractor, the FCV reduced onboard energy consumption by approximately 31–54%, while the BEV configurations achieved reductions of approximately 62–75%, depending on workload and battery capacity. The Ser HEV reduced energy consumption under light and medium workloads but showed an 11.1% increase under the high-load condition because of additional energy-conversion stages. Energy-distribution analysis showed that electrification substantially reduces power-source losses while increasing the relative importance of drivetrain- and wheel-to-drawbar losses. Within the adopted comparative model, increasing battery capacity for extended BEV operation increased vehicle mass and was associated with greater modeled wheel-to-drawbar loss, resulting in higher onboard energy demand for the long-range BEV than for the short-range configuration. These results demonstrate that tractor electrification should be evaluated at the system level by considering energy-conversion pathways, energy-management strategy, onboard energy capacity, and vehicle mass together.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Baek et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: