Evaluates economic and environmental performance of electric trailers, indicating significant benefits.
Although critical to modern logistics, heavy-duty commercial vehicles face mounting pressure to improve energy efficiency and reduce emissions. The aim of this study was to evaluate the techno-economic and environmental performance of four vehicle configurations: internal combustion engine (ICE) tractors and battery electric tractors (BETs), each respectively paired with either a conventional or an electrified trailer. To optimize energy utilization while proactively mitigating the longitudinal impact risks that trigger vehicle instability, a coordinated control strategy based on power decoupling and a real-time, efficiency-oriented torque distribution strategy were designed. Simulations under C-WTVC and CHTC-TT cycles revealed that electrified trailers substantially improved the system efficiency. Under fully loaded conditions, BETs paired with electrified trailers reduced the direct energy expenditures by 76.5% compared to conventional ICE vehicles. Notably, compared to pure electric tractors with conventional trailers, the addition of electrified trailers further reduced the energy consumption by 29.1%. Meanwhile, ICE tractors paired with electrified trailers achieved a 35.6% energy cost reduction. Furthermore, a fuel-cycle well-to-wheels (WTW) assessment of the use phase, based on a specified regional grid emission factor, demonstrated that the BETs and hybrid configurations reduced the operational greenhouse gas emissions by 64.9% and 29.3%, respectively, compared to the baseline. These findings indicate that trailer electrification offers consistent economic and environmental benefits under the simulated scenarios, thereby providing a robust theoretical foundation for the low-carbon transition, transportation sustainability, and selection of sustainable technologies in road freight.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tong et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: