Options for flexible online learning are essential because they remove barriers to education and make learning accessible to a much wider range of people. A greater demand for flexible online instruction highlights a critical need for accessible, active-learning science curricula. Teaching complex, dynamic cellular processes like meiosis and non-disjunction is notoriously difficult in independent or asynchronous environments due to high student cognitive load and frequent misconceptions regarding these processes. To address this, a flexible, low-cost virtual laboratory was developed using tactile modeling embedded in a relatable, pop-culture zombie narrative. This study evaluated the pedagogical efficacy and student perceptions of this exercise across multiple undergraduate-level introductory biology laboratory sections ( n = 48 paired responses). Paired pre- and post-assessment data demonstrated a statistically significant increase in overall conceptual knowledge, with average student scores rising from 66.88% to 75.73%. Granular item analysis revealed that while rote vocabulary scores remained unchanged, students achieved significant learning gains in process-driven mechanics, phase identification, and mid-level cognitive skills within Bloom’s taxonomy. Qualitative survey data showed high student self-efficacy, with over half reporting the lab significantly aided their understanding, despite baseline affective ambivalence typical of independent active learning. Furthermore, multi-instructor deployment demonstrated that while designed for asynchronous delivery, this curriculum possesses the structural flexibility to adapt seamlessly to synchronous, hybrid, or in-person flipped classrooms, offering an equitable and adaptable framework for modern multimodal STEM education.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cristina M. Cummings (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: