Freedom of movement enables young Europeans to pursue work across borders. An intention to work abroad may nevertheless also represent a potential “transnational exit” when domestic employment does not offer sufficiently predictable conditions, effective rights, or credible worker voice. This socio-legal article combines a cross-sectional survey of Hungarians aged 18–30 with doctrinal and institutional analysis of EU and Hungarian labour law. The survey yielded 265 usable responses; analyses of work-related variables used the employed subsample (N = 146). Meaningful work was negatively associated with personal intention to work abroad. Overall precariousness had no statistically significant direct association with that intention, but it was associated with a more positive general attitude towards foreign work and showed an indirect association with intention through lower meaningfulness. At high levels of meaningful work, the precariousness-intention association was positive and statistically significant. The findings support a retention policy that respects free movement while making staying a genuine choice through enforceable rights, effective inspection, protection against retaliation, and accessible collective voice.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jácint Ferencz (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: