Traditional proppants have high density and insufficient strength for deep reservoirs. Epoxy‐based proppants combine low density, good suspension, high‐temperature resistance, and chemical corrosion resistance and are a research focus in oilfield fracturing materials. Here, single‐factor experiments were used to optimize the formulation and process, and performance was evaluated according to SY/T 5108–2014 and SY/T 6302–2019. At emulsifier, curing agent, dispersant A, and dispersant B dosages of 17%, 70%, 0.4%, and 668 ppm, respectively, based on epoxy resin mass, the products exhibited a sorting coefficient of 1.22–2.08, sphericity above 0.9, apparent density of 1.15–1.21 g/cm 3 , and bulk density of 0.34–0.57 g/cm 3 . The sorting coefficient characterizes the entire as‐prepared product, whereas conductivity and breakage were measured using the manually dry‐sieved 20–40 mesh fraction. This fraction showed a breakage rate of 3.32%–4.67% at 69 MPa. Nano‐SiO 2 enhanced conductivity and, under nitrogen, increased the 10% mass‐loss temperature from approximately 211°C to 230°C, indicating delayed thermal degradation. These results support epoxy resin‐based in situ generated proppants as lightweight alternatives for hydraulic fracturing.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhong et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: