Lactic acid bacteria combining probiotic properties with acidification capacity and stress tolerance are valuable for food fermentation but remain insufficiently characterized. In this study, a strain of Pediococcus acidilactici, designated PA-X1, was isolated from pastoral fermented yak yogurt collected from the Qinghai–Tibet Plateau. Its in vitro probiotic-related properties, acidification performance, genomic characteristics, and expression patterns of key genes associated with acidification-related metabolism were investigated. After 24 h of fermentation, the broth pH decreased to 3.75 ± 0.02 and the L-lactic acid concentration reached 8.53 ± 0.23 g/L. The glucose concentration decreased from the measured initial value of 20.0 g/L at 0 h to 6.00 g/L at 24 h, corresponding to 70.0% glucose consumption. PA-X1 showed a survival rate of 94.64 ± 0.10% at pH 3.0, and its culture supernatant inhibited all three tested indicator bacteria, namely Escherichia coli, Salmonella enterica, and Staphylococcus aureus, in vitro. Genomic analysis identified multiple genes associated with acidification-related metabolism, including those involved in the phosphotransferase system (PTS), the Embden–Meyerhof–Parnas pathway, pyruvate metabolism and lactate synthesis. Additionally, the PTS-related genes ptsI, ptsH, and crr were significantly upregulated under high-glucose conditions (40 g/L), whereas low-pH conditions induced varying degrees of upregulation of glycolysis- and pyruvate-metabolism-related genes, including pgk, eno, tpiA, ldhA, ldhL, and ackA. Together, these phenotypic, genomic, and gene-expression results suggest that the acidification phenotype of PA-X1 may be associated with carbohydrate uptake, glycolysis, pyruvate metabolism, and organic acid formation. Overall, the combined probiotic-related, acidification, and antibacterial properties of PA-X1 support its potential as a functional starter culture for developing probiotic fermented foods with improved microbial safety and functional value.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: