This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
Open-cut pipeline construction (OCPC) involves complex cost behavior driven by uncertain and interdependent factors, making it a challenging domain for decision-making. Although machine learning, simulation, and optimization methods have been widely studied individually, their integration into coherent knowledge-driven decision-support systems remains limited. This study derives a structured and conceptual pathway linking cost estimation to cost optimization under uncertainty and uses it as the organizing framework for a systematic review. The pathway comprises seven interconnected domains – cost estimation, fuzzy logic, numerical modeling, machine learning, simulation, sensitivity analysis, and optimization – organized as a knowledge processing sequence rather than independent methods. A systematic analysis of 288 studies screened from 1,030 Web of Science records shows that existing research lacks structured integration: over 90% of studies examined in this review apply no more than two methods, and even the corpus’s most frequent pairing – cost estimation with optimization, 47 papers – occurs at 59% of the frequency that statistical independence would predict (φ = − 0.47). The study specifies the dependencies between methods as a knowledge-based reference architecture – specifying its parameter, model, and rule knowledge base; an ordered, forward-chained inference sequence; the input–output representation; and the decision logic separating system-supported analysis from planner judgment – and identifies five missing inferential links. The contribution is a measured map of the integration gap and a specified reference architecture for developing hybrid expert systems that unify predictive modeling, uncertainty reasoning, and optimization for OCPC decision support.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Biswas et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: