Key result
Eight-gene blood transcriptomic index accurately identifies acute myocardial infarction across discovery and validation cohorts.
Why the study?
Despite the prognostic potential of individual immune biomarkers in acute myocardial infarction, no multi-omics machine learning-derived immune gene signature had been established for predicting AMI outcome.
Does a machine learning-derived eight-gene blood transcriptomic index accurately discriminate acute myocardial infarction from stable coronary artery disease or healthy controls?
Case-Control (n=348)
Yes
Does a machine learning-derived eight-gene blood transcriptomic index accurately discriminate acute myocardial infarction from stable coronary artery disease or healthy controls?
Effect estimate: AUC 0.984 in discovery; validation AUCs 0.863, 0.655, and 0.876
An eight-gene blood transcriptomic index derived via nested machine learning discriminated acute myocardial infarction across multiple cohorts and tracked with myeloid-driven inflammatory and inflammasome activation programs.
Background Globally, acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is the foremost cause of cardiovascular fatality, with dysregulated immune-inflammatory cascades serving as master regulators of both acute cardiomyocyte necrosis and subsequent maladaptive remodeling. Despite the prognostic potential of individual immune biomarkers, no multi-omics machine learning (ML)-derived immune gene signature has been established for predicting AMI outcome. Methods Peripheral blood transcriptomes from four Gene Expression Omnibus datasets (GSE59867 as the discovery cohort; GSE48060, GSE60993, and GSE66360 as independent validation cohorts; total 348 participants) were subjected to study-wise differential expression analysis and marker-based immune scoring without cross-platform batch harmonization. Weighted gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA) and nested machine learning (L2-regularized logistic regression, linear support vector machine (SVM), random forest, and gradient boosting) were used to derive an eight-gene diagnostic index. Signature performance was evaluated in three independent validation cohorts, contextualized at the single-cell resolution (GSE121893), and experimentally supported by in vitro reverse transcription quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) using American Type Culture Collection (ATCC)-authenticated cell lines (THP-1 TIB-202 and EA.hy926 CRL-2922). Results AMI specimens showed marked enrichment of pro-inflammatory M1-like macrophages, neutrophils, and exhausted CD8+ T cells compared to healthy donors. The WGCNA turquoise module exhibited the strongest phenotypic correlation (r = 0.78, p < 0.001). Convergent machine learning analysis yielded an eight-gene diagnostic index (BAX, EDA2R, MCEMP1, SOCS3, ASGR2, RNASE1, ADM, and KPNA5) with a repeated out-of-fold area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.984 in the discovery cohort and independent validation AUCs of 0.863, 0.655, and 0.876. Two exploratory binary-outcome analyses (6-month heart failure progression and 18-month recurrent events) yielded AUCs of 0.819 and 0.569, respectively; these small-sample results are descriptive only and do not support Kaplan–Meier or hazard ratio claims. In vitro RT-qPCR in ATCC-authenticated THP-1-derived macrophages (lipopolysaccharide/ATP stimulation) and EA.hy926 cells (hypoxia/reoxygenation) confirmed elevated levels of CXCL10 (3.82 ± 0.31-fold), IL6 (4.15 ± 0.44-fold), NLRP3 (2.94 ± 0.28-fold), and CASP1 (3.47 ± 0.38-fold) under AMI-relevant stimulation conditions ( n = 3 independent biological replicates). Conclusions An eight-gene diagnostic index (BAX, EDA2R, MCEMP1, SOCS3, ASGR2, RNASE1, ADM, and KPNA5), derived using nested machine learning and validated in three independent cohorts, achieved robust discriminative accuracy for AMI diagnosis. Elevated inflammatory transcripts (CXCL10, IL6, NLRP3, and CASP1) confirmed by in vitro RT-qPCR in ATCC cell lines reflect concurrent inflammasome activation and immune dysregulation, offering a mechanistic rationale for precision immune-targeted intervention strategies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pan et al. (2026) conducted a case-control in Acute myocardial infarction (n=348). Eight-gene diagnostic transcriptomic index (BAX, EDA2R, MCEMP1, SOCS3, ASGR2, RNASE1, ADM, and KPNA5) vs. Stable coronary artery disease or healthy controls was evaluated on Diagnostic discrimination of acute myocardial infarction from controls (AUC 0.984 in discovery; validation AUCs 0.863, 0.655, and 0.876). An eight-gene blood transcriptomic index distinguished acute myocardial infarction from controls with an out-of-fold AUC of 0.984 in discovery and 0.863, 0.655, and 0.876 across validation cohorts.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: