Why the study?
Despite advances in post-mortem diagnostics after sudden cardiac death, communication of autopsy findings to surviving relatives remains inconsistent, leaving bereaved families with unmet informational and emotional needs despite potential hereditary cardiac risks.
This paper establishes the first expert consensus-based framework for the Balkan region to standardize the communication of autopsy findings after sudden cardiac death, integrating forensic, cardiological, and genetic perspectives to facilitate family support and cascade screening for heritable cardiac diseases.
Establishes a standardized disclosure pathway after sudden cardiac death; extends ethical guidelines with the first Balkan consensus framework for family counseling and cascade screening.
Sudden cardiac death (SCD) is a devastating event not only for determining the cause of death but also for the health of surviving relatives, as autopsy findings may reveal hereditary heart disorders that imply detailed cardiological evaluation, genetic counseling, and cascade screening of family members. Beyond their informative value, communication of autopsy findings raises ethical issues related to transparency, disclosure of hereditary risk, professional responsibility, and family-centered care. Despite advances in post-mortem diagnostics, communication remains inconsistent, and bereaved families frequently report unmet informational and emotional needs. To our knowledge, this is the first expert consensus-based, network-derived communication framework for the Balkan region the Balkan region, integrating ethical principles with forensic, genetic and cardiological perspectives to support structured, family-centered post-mortem care. The authors examined current evidence regarding the ethical and practical challenges of communicating autopsy findings following SCD. Afterwards, a structured, network-based development process was carried out within seven Departments of Forensic Medicine with the aim to improve the quality and consistency of communication with bereaved families in the Balkan region. Participants developed communication pathway following sudden cardiac death. The proposed pathway emphasizes early family engagement, continuous communication throughout the investigation, structured communication of autopsy findings, family counseling in cases of suspected heritable cardiac disease, including referral for cardiological evaluation and genetic counseling when appropriate, cascade screening of at-risk relatives, and long-term follow-up. The pathway is intended as a practical communication framework and as a good practice in forensic medicine for pathologists. Communication of autopsy findings is an important part of postmortem care following sudden cardiac death, not just the transmission of diagnostic information. Beyond the conversation, there is an ethical responsibility to bereaved families and next of kin. Although current evidence is limited, it consistently supports structured communication with the bereaved family, respects family autonomy, and facilitates appropriate assessment of relatives in cases where a hereditary disease is suspected. This proposed framework may improve communication skills in forensic practice, strengthen multidisciplinary collaboration, and provide a basis for future validation studies and the development of evidence-based guidelines.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Petrović et al. (2026) studied Sudden cardiac death (n=7). Structured, network-based expert consensus communication framework was evaluated on Development of a phased communication framework and baseline mapping of post-mortem communication practices across participating centers. Baseline practice mapping across 7 Balkan forensic centers showed 0% provided written family materials and 57% (4/7) had cascade screening referral pathways, prompting a 6-part consensus framework.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: