Key result
AI-detected sinus-rhythm TTE patterns are linked to ~64% higher risk of subsequent AF.
Why the study?
Paroxysmal AF is underdiagnosed because it is intermittent and asymptomatic, motivating an evaluation of whether a deep neural network applied to sinus-rhythm TTEs can discriminate between patients with and without documented AF and identify risk for subsequent AF and adverse outcomes.
Does a deep neural network applied to sinus-rhythm transthoracic echocardiograms identify patients with prior or subsequent atrial fibrillation and predict adverse clinical outcomes?
Observational (n=85,686)
Does a deep neural network applied to sinus-rhythm transthoracic echocardiograms identify patients with prior or subsequent atrial fibrillation and predict adverse clinical outcomes?
Hazard Ratio: 1.64 (95% CI 1.33–2.04)
Deep learning analysis of routine sinus-rhythm echocardiograms can accurately detect occult atrial fibrillation and identify patients at elevated risk for future atrial fibrillation and adverse cardiovascular outcomes.
Background and Aims Paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF) is underdiagnosed due to its intermittent and asymptomatic nature. We evaluated whether a deep neural network applied to transthoracic echocardiograms (TTEs) acquired in sinus rhythm can discriminate between patients with and without documented AF and identify individuals at increased risk for subsequent AF documentation and adverse outcomes. Methods We retrospectively analyzed 85,686 TTE studies (2009–2021). A deep neural network was applied to apical four-chamber and parasternal long-axis videos without Doppler. AF ground truth was based on ICD codes, ECG, Holter, or prior echocardiographic documentation of AF. The dataset was split into training (60%), validation (20%), and an independent test set (20%). In the test cohort, we assessed discrimination performance. Among patients without prior AF, we evaluated associations between model classification and subsequent AF documentation and a composite outcome of all-cause mortality, heart failure hospitalization, or stroke. Results The test set included 17,121 patients (median age 66 years [IQR 54–75]; 57.6% male), of whom 3,449 (20.1%) had prior AF. The model achieved an AUC of 0.85, with sensitivity 0.80 and specificity 0.72. At the selected threshold, 6,581 patients (38.4%) were classified as model-positive, including 3,832 (58.2%) without prior AF. Among patients without prior AF, model-positive classification was associated with subsequent AF documentation (adjusted HR 1.64; 95% CI 1.33–2.04) and with the composite outcome (adjusted HR 1.24; 95% CI 1.13–1.35). Conclusion Deep learning applied to sinus-rhythm TTE demonstrates discrimination for AF and identifies an imaging-derived signal associated with subsequent AF documentation and adverse outcomes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cohen et al. (2026) conducted an observational in Atrial fibrillation (n=85,686). Deep neural network applied to sinus-rhythm transthoracic echocardiograms (model-positive classification) vs. Model-negative classification was evaluated on Subsequent atrial fibrillation documentation among patients without prior AF (HR 1.64, 95% CI 1.33-2.04).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: