Key result
MEESSI-AHF and EHMRG scores show comparable discrimination for short-term mortality in acute heart failure.
Why the study?
Prospective data validating international acute heart failure risk scores within the Indian healthcare ecosystem are lacking. This study compared the MEESSI-AHF and EHMRG scores to determine which model better predicts short-term mortality in Indian patients with AHF.
Do the MEESSI-AHF and EHMRG risk scores accurately predict 7-day and 30-day mortality in Indian patients presenting with acute heart failure?
Cohort (n=127)
No
Do the MEESSI-AHF and EHMRG risk scores accurately predict 7-day and 30-day mortality in Indian patients presenting with acute heart failure?
Effect estimate: AUC 0.862 vs 0.874 (95% CI 0.781-0.943)
Absolute Event Rate: 0.862% vs 0.874%
p-value: p=0.665
In an Indian acute heart failure cohort, both MEESSI-AHF and EHMRG scores demonstrated good and comparable discrimination for 7-day and 30-day mortality, though EHMRG substantially underestimated absolute 7-day mortality risk and requires local recalibration before clinical use.
Comparable discrimination of MEESSI-AHF and EHMRG for short-term AHF mortality in India; extends validation while leaving calibration and broader use open.
Background Acute heart failure (AHF) is a complex, potentially fatal condition characterized by rapid symptom onset due to inefficient heart function. Globally, AHF poses a significant burden, with incidence and outcomes varying by geography, demographics, and clinical factors. In India, cardiovascular diseases contribute heavily to morbidity and mortality, making accurate prediction of short-term mortality in AHF patients critical for improving patient management. There is a critical lack of prospective data validating international risk scores within the Indian healthcare ecosystem. This study aimed to compare the MEESSI-AHF and EHMRG scores in predicting short-term mortality in AHF patients in India, and to determine which model provides better risk stratification, potentially guiding clinical decisions and enhancing patient management strategies. Methods A prospective single-center validation study was conducted from January to July 2024 in a tertiary care center in Coastal Karnataka. AHF patients diagnosed using the Framingham criteria and the ESC diagnostic algorithm were assessed at admission, with MEESSI-AHF and EHMRG scores calculated. Mortality outcomes were tracked at day 7 and day 30 by phone call or follow-up visit. Data were analyzed using SPSS 29.0. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was used to assess the discrimination of both scores for 7-day and 30-day mortality, and the AUCs were compared using the DeLong test, with a two-sided p-value < 0.05 considered significant. Results Of 128 patients enrolled, 127 had a determinate outcome and were analyzed. For 30-day mortality the AUC was 0.862 for MEESSI-AHF and 0.874 for EHMRG; for 7-day mortality it was 0.819 and 0.827, respectively, with no significant difference between the two scores at either time point (DeLong p = 0.665 and p = 0.803). NYHA class IV, ACS episodes, NT-proBNP, and serum creatinine were associated with 30-day mortality in univariable analysis; in an exploratory multivariable model, only NT-proBNP remained independently associated with mortality after adjustment for creatinine. Conclusions In this single-center prospective cohort of Indian patients with acute heart failure, MEESSI-AHF and EHMRG showed good and similar discriminatory performance for short-term mortality. Calibration assessment showed that EHMRG substantially underestimated absolute 7-day mortality (mean predicted 3.0% vs. observed 8.7%), while MEESSI-AHF showed only modest underestimation for 30-day mortality. Given the small number of events, these findings should be considered preliminary and require confirmation, together with local recalibration, in larger multicenter cohorts.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bhat et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Acute heart failure (n=127). MEESSI-AHF risk score vs. EHMRG risk score was evaluated on 30-day mortality discrimination (AUC) (AUC 0.862 vs 0.874, 95% CI 0.781-0.943, p=0.665). MEESSI-AHF and EHMRG scores showed good and comparable discrimination for 30-day (AUC 0.862 vs 0.874, p=0.665) and 7-day mortality (AUC 0.819 vs 0.827, p=0.803) in Indian AHF patients.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: