Key result
NOAC monotherapy cuts bleeding versus combination therapy regardless of stent age in chronic PCI.
Why the study?
Although NOAC monotherapy is generally recommended beyond 1 year after DES implantation in patients with AF, the temporal evolution of ischemic and bleeding risks remains inadequately characterized, and whether the effects of NOAC monotherapy versus combination therapy differ by stent age is unclear.
Does the effect of NOAC monotherapy versus combination therapy (NOAC plus clopidogrel) on 1-year net adverse clinical events differ by stent age in patients with atrial fibrillation who underwent drug-eluting stent implantation ≥ 1 year earlier?
RCT (n=960)
Does the effect of NOAC monotherapy versus combination therapy (NOAC plus clopidogrel) on 1-year net adverse clinical events differ by stent age in patients with atrial fibrillation who underwent drug-eluting stent implantation ≥ 1 year earlier?
In patients with atrial fibrillation at least 1 year after drug-eluting stent implantation, the safety and effectiveness of NOAC monotherapy over combination therapy with clopidogrel are consistent regardless of whether stent implantation occurred 1–2 years or >2 years prior.
Supports stopping clopidogrel at 1 year post-PCI in AF patients on NOACs; confirms ADAPT AF-DES benefits apply equally to intermediate- and remote-age stents.
Although non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant (NOAC) monotherapy is generally recommended beyond 1 year after drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF), the temporal evolution of ischemic and bleeding risks remains inadequately characterized. This study assessed whether the effects of NOAC monotherapy versus combination therapy differ by stent age in patients with AF who underwent DES implantation ≥ 1 year earlier. This prespecified analysis of the Appropriate Duration of Anti-Platelet and Thrombotic Strategy After 12 Months in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation Treated with Drug-Eluting Stents (ADAPT AF-DES) trial compared NOAC monotherapy with combination therapy (NOAC plus clopidogrel) by stent age. Patients were classified into the remote percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) group (stent age > 2 years; n = 577) and the intermediate PCI group (stent age 1–2 years; n = 383). The primary endpoint was 1-year net adverse clinical events (NACE). No significant interaction between antithrombotic strategy and stent age was found for NACE. NOAC monotherapy was associated with less major bleeding or clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding than combination therapy in both subgroups without interaction. Although a significant interaction was observed for composite ischemic outcomes in the prespecified analysis, it was no longer observed when stent age was modeled as a continuous variable or after adjustment in sensitivity analyses. Among patients with AF ≥ 1 year post-DES, no consistent interactions by stent age were observed for clinical outcomes, supporting the safety and effectiveness of NOAC monotherapy across the spectrum of stent age.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jin et al. (2026) conducted an RCT in Atrial fibrillation with drug-eluting stents implanted ≥1 year earlier (n=960). Non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant (NOAC) monotherapy vs. Combination therapy (NOAC plus clopidogrel) was evaluated on 1-year net adverse clinical events (NACE). NOAC monotherapy showed no significant interaction with stent age (>2 vs 1-2 years, N=960) for 1-year net adverse clinical events and reduced bleeding versus NOAC plus clopidogrel in both groups.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: