Key result
High LAD angio-IMR plus high CTI linked to ~5.3-fold higher MACE risk in dilated cardiomyopathy.
Why the study?
The prognostic value of coronary microvascular dysfunction, assessed by angiography-derived index of microcirculatory resistance, and systemic metabolic-inflammatory dysregulation, evaluated via the C-reactive protein-triglyceride-glucose index, remained uncharacterized in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy.
Does the combined assessment of angiography-derived index of microcirculatory resistance (angio-IMR) and C-reactive protein-triglyceride-glucose index (CTI) improve risk prediction of major adverse cardiovascular events in patients with non-ischemic dilated cardiomyopathy?
Cohort (n=343)
Yes
Does the combined assessment of angiography-derived index of microcirculatory resistance (angio-IMR) and C-reactive protein-triglyceride-glucose index (CTI) improve risk prediction of major adverse cardiovascular events in patients with non-ischemic dilated cardiomyopathy?
Hazard Ratio: 5.35 (95% CI 2.65–10.81)
p-value: p=<0.001
In patients with non-ischemic dilated cardiomyopathy, combining wire-free coronary microvascular resistance assessment (LAD angio-IMR) with the C-reactive protein-triglyceride-glucose index (CTI) independently predicts major adverse cardiovascular events and significantly improves risk stratification over conventional clinical predictors.
May refine MACE risk stratification in dilated cardiomyopathy; hypothesis-generating pending prospective validation.
The prognostic value of coronary microvascular dysfunction, assessed by angiography-derived index of microcirculatory resistance (angio-IMR), and systemic metabolic-inflammatory dysregulation, evaluated via the C-reactive protein-triglyceride-glucose index (CTI), remains uncharacterized in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM). In this multicenter retrospective study of 343 DCM patients, angio-IMR and CTI were calculated. The CTI was calculated by \(\:{0.412} × {ln}{({CRP}[{mg}/{L}])+}{ln}{({TG}[{mg}/{dL}] {×} {FPG}[{mg}/{dL}])/{2}}\) . The primary outcome was major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), a composite of cardiac death or heart failure readmission. Over a median 4.04-year follow-up, 124 patients (36.2%) experienced MACE. Multivariable analysis identified both left anterior descending artery (LAD) angio-IMR [adjusted hazard ratio (HR) 1.04, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.01–1.08, p = 0.020] and CTI (adjusted HR 2.08, 95% CI 1.32–3.28, p = 0.002) as independent predictors. Patients with high LAD angio-IMR had significantly higher MACE incidence than those with low values (58.71% vs. 34.71%, p < 0.001). Those with both high LAD angio-IMR and high CTI experienced the highest event rates, and only this subgroup remained an independent predictor of MACE after adjustment (adjusted HR 5.35, 95% CI 2.65–10.81, p < 0.001). A model combining angio-IMR and CTI significantly improved risk discrimination over conventional clinical predictors (area under the curve 0.783 vs. 0.708, p = 0.018). Elevated LAD angio-IMR and CTI are independent prognostic indicators in DCM. Their combined assessment facilitates the identification of the highest-risk patient subsets and provides substantial incremental predictive value for MACE beyond conventional clinical risk models. The name of the registry: ClinicalTrials.gov. The trial registration number: NCT07293338. The date that we registered our trial in December 17, 2025.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jin et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Non-ischemic dilated cardiomyopathy (n=343). High LAD angio-IMR (≥30.7) and high C-reactive protein-triglyceride-glucose index (CTI ≥5.59) vs. Low LAD angio-IMR (<30.7) and low CTI (<5.59) was evaluated on Major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), a composite of cardiac death or heart failure readmission (HR 5.35, 95% CI 2.65-10.81, p=<0.001). High LAD angio-IMR combined with high CTI independently predicted MACE (adjusted HR 5.35, 95% CI 2.65-10.81, p<0.001) and improved risk discrimination in dilated cardiomyopathy.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: