Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Objective Healthcare providers' perspectives on interpreting services offer critical insights for interpreters training and policy development. In China, AI-assisted ad hoc interpreting arrangements are the status quo; however, little is known about practitioners' perspectives on this mode in cross-linguistic TCM (Traditional Chinese Medicine) clinical practice. This study is part of an attempt to bridge that gap. Methods A cross-sectional qualitative study design was employed. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 21 TCM practitioners, and the data were analyzed using thematic analysis. Results Six themes were identified from the data: information loss and diagnostic uncertainty; when equivalence fails, inequivalence emerges; redistribution of power and trust relations; communication barriers and professional identity erosion; necessary but suboptimal; and beyond interpreting toward understanding. Conclusions TCM practitioners reported considerable drawbacks in using “ ad hoc +AI” mode, with implications for clinical compromise and erosion of professional identity. There is a need for professional interpreting services to ensure that all individuals seeking TCM care can receive equitable care.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Geng et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: