Key result
Transcatheter tricuspid valve intervention significantly improved renal venous blood flow profiles at 1-3 months (p=0.003), reducing severe congestion (Grade IV/V) from 66.7% (20/30) to 30.0% (9/30).
Why the study?
While transcatheter tricuspid valve intervention (TTVI) effectively reduces tricuspid regurgitation (TR), its impact on visceral venous congestion in patients with severe TR remained unknown.
Does transcatheter tricuspid valve intervention (TTVI) improve visceral venous congestion (renal venous blood flow profiles) in patients with severe tricuspid regurgitation?
Observational (n=30)
Does transcatheter tricuspid valve intervention (TTVI) improve visceral venous congestion (renal venous blood flow profiles) in patients with severe tricuspid regurgitation?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Successful transcatheter tricuspid valve intervention significantly improves renal and portal venous blood flow profiles, demonstrating physiological visceral decongestion in patients with severe tricuspid regurgitation.
Introduction Tricuspid regurgitation (TR) is frequently associated with severe venous congestion, increasingly recognized as a key factor in the development of cardiorenal syndrome. While transcatheter tricuspid valve intervention (TTVI) has shown to be effective in TR reduction, their impact on visceral venous congestion remains unknown. The aim of our study was to investigate visceral venous congestion in patients with severe TR undergoing TTVI. Methods We prospectively enrolled 30 patients undergoing TTVI for severe TR. Renal venous blood flow was assessed by Doppler ultrasound examination at baseline and 1 to 3 months after the procedure. A 5‐grade rating scale was developed to categorize venous flow from continuous (Grade I°) through discontinuous to a pendulous venous flow (Grade V°) within the kidneys. Results Transcatheter edge‐to‐edge repair (TEER, n = 24) was performed in 24 patients; 6 patients underwent heterotopic caval valve implantation. At baseline, severe renal congestion was present in most participants, with 20 patients showing venous flow profiles IV or V. Venous flow profiles strongly correlated with invasively measured right atrial mean pressure and V wave ( p < 0.01). At follow‐up, venous renal blood flow profiles improved significantly ( p = 0.003), reducing patients with profiles IV or V from 20 to 9. Portal vein flow showed comparable decongestive changes. In TEER patients, reduction of TR ≥ 2 grades was associated with improved renal vein profile at follow‐up ( p = 0.002). Conclusion Successful TTVI leads to visceral decongestion. Renal venous flow currently represents a physiological marker of congestion that may complement conventional echocardiographic parameters; its role in guiding patient selection or timing of intervention remains to be determined in larger studies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Putz et al. (2026) conducted an observational in Severe tricuspid regurgitation (n=30). Transcatheter tricuspid valve intervention (TTVI) vs. Baseline (pre-intervention) was evaluated on Severe renal venous congestion (venous flow profiles Grade IV or V) (p=0.003). Transcatheter tricuspid valve intervention significantly improved renal venous blood flow profiles at 1-3 months (p=0.003), reducing severe congestion (Grade IV/V) from 66.7% (20/30) to 30.0% (9/30).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: