Objectives To assess the feasibility of implementing dose banding for intravenous oncologic preparations in a medium-sized hospital, quantifying the proportion of individualised doses that could be covered by predefined bands, the dose deviations and the proportion of doses that would be discarded. Methods A simulation study was performed using all oncologic intravenous preparations compounded for the oncology day-care clinic during 2023 in a 485-bed hospital. Drugs were eligible if they were prescribed at individualised doses, had post-compounding stability of at least 14 days and exceeded 300 preparations per year. Logarithmic dose bands were constructed for each drug using two target coverage scenarios (60% and 80% of preparations) and three band configurations (five, four and three bands). Scenarios were accepted only when all band-related deviations from the individualised dose remained within ±5%. Weekly demand was simulated over 52 weeks to estimate required stock and expiry-related discard. Results Of 43 oncologic drug presentations compounded in 2023, four met the predefined criteria for dose banding analysis: bevacizumab, irinotecan, paclitaxel and trastuzumab. In the five-band, 60% target scenario, acceptable dose banding was feasible for all four drugs, covering 61.4% of bevacizumab, 59.0% of irinotecan, 71.2% of paclitaxel and 62.1% of trastuzumab preparations. In the five-band, 80% target scenario, only paclitaxel and trastuzumab remained feasible, covering 79.0% and 79.8% of preparations, respectively. Four-band and three-band scenarios reduced feasibility further. Estimated discard remained below 10% for bevacizumab, irinotecan and trastuzumab in feasible simulations, but ranged from 10.9% to 23.8% for paclitaxel. Conclusions In this medium-sized hospital, dose banding was feasible only for a limited number of stable, high-volume antineoplastic drugs and remained highly dependent on the drug selected and the band configuration used. These findings support a selective, locally tailored approach to dose banding rather than routine implementation across all eligible oncology preparations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fortunato et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: