Participatory irrigation governance depends on water-user associations whose members hold unequal land endowments, yet the coalition-formation algorithms proposed for computer agriculture typically assume symmetric agents or ignore institutional constraints on coalition size and composition. The analysis is theoretical and methodological: it specifies a cooperative-game representation of water-user associations in which farm size determines both water demand and voting weight, imposes institutional constraints on coalition membership, and derives a bound on the core stability of the resulting coalition structure as a function of the dispersion of farm sizes and the tightness of the constraints. The bound is then used to characterise the conditions under which algorithmic coalition recommendations remain stable against defection by large and small holders.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Té et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: