Groundwater abstraction permits in computer agriculture allocate a shared aquifer among competing irrigators, yet the political legitimacy of any allocation rule depends on whether the rule can be shown to converge to a defensible distribution of abstraction rights under drawdown. The framework treats each abstraction permit as a constrained policy in a cooperative Markov game with a shared aquifer state, and characterises legitimacy as the regret of the permit regime relative to a counterfactual social planner who internalises drawdown externalities. The analysis is theoretical: no observational data are used or claimed. The principal result is a regret bound of order O(√(T log N)) for N agents over T allocation rounds under a constrained policy gradient, with an explicit dependence on the aquifer drawdown rate and the permit enforcement capacity of the regulator. The bound implies that legitimacy is not a property of the allocation rule alone but of the rate at which the rule's regret grows relative to the physical depletion of the aquifer.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Waberi et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: