Sparse plot histories undermine the actuarial credibility of area-yield insurance, because the between-plot variance that drives risk is estimated from too few observations per unit. The design is characterised analytically and by a replication-based power study with 2000 replications per design cell, across 8, 16, 24 and 32 clusters and effect sizes of 3, 5 and 8 percentage points. Under a between-cluster standard deviation of 6.0, a residual standard deviation of 4.5 and an intraclass correlation of 0.64, the analysis shows that 52 clusters are required to detect a 5 percentage point effect at 80 per cent power. The paper states a finite-sample calibration bound that links the nominal coverage of the yield-loss interval to the number of clusters and the intraclass correlation, and it derives the conditions under which the bound remains conservative when plot histories are incomplete. The contribution is a formal bridge between design-based power analysis and distributional calibration for underwriting decisions, together with an explicit statement of the boundary conditions under which the guarantee holds.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mothibi et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: