Post-hoc calibration of artificial intelligence crop-yield ensembles is widely proposed as a remedy for the distributional instability that undermines index insurance in smallholder settings. The problem is formalised as a partial-identification question: the calibration map from ensemble predictions to yield realisations is not point-identified when the joint distribution of predictors and outcomes shifts between training and deployment, but it may be bounded. A calibration-identification bound is derived from the worst-case divergence between source and target predictor distributions, and the bound is shown to widen monotonically with the magnitude of the shift. The analysis then connects the bound to basis-risk equity, defined as the dispersion of the gap between insurance payouts and realised losses across smallholder subgroups. A key result is that post-hoc calibration can reduce aggregate basis risk while increasing subgroup dispersion, because the calibration map is estimated on a pooled sample whose subgroup composition differs from the deployment population. The argument is methodological and theoretical; no empirical calibration is performed, and the results are propositions about identification rather than estimates from data.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mothibe et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: