Most research and monitoring activities involving low-cost atmospheric sensors (LC) have traditionally focused on urban environments, where air quality is a pressing concern. However, an emerging area of research is their application in rural landscapes, where land use is a key determinant of climate change and net zero outcomes, directly influencing greenhouse gas emissions, carbon sequestration, and ecosystem functioning. In this study, we examine the use of LC non-dispersive infrared (NDIR) CO2 sensors to monitor atmospheric mixing ratios in agricultural settings. We present a data analysis framework that addresses errors associated with factory auto-baseline correction and, crucially, accounts for the influence of environmental parameters such as temperature and pressure. This approach leads to improved sensor performance. Results from deployments in both rural and urban environments demonstrate strong agreement with reference-grade instruments, as shown by the root mean square error (RMSE) and coefficient of determination (R2). Improvements of RMSE from 10 ppm to 4 ppm in winter and 5 ppm to 4 ppm in summer, with corresponding improved R2 from 0.85 to 0.98 in winter and 0.86 to 0.97 in summer were obtained when compared to a simple scaling correction of the out-of-box data. Our study shows that corrected data not only reproduced the seasonal profile associated with rural emissions, but it also captured the diurnal variability, sometimes characterised by CO2 change of up to 50 ppm, which is more than three times the typical change in the urban environment (15 ppm). Overall, this study establishes that field calibrated low-cost CO2 sensors and sensor networks can provide reliable, long-term atmospheric monitoring in rural environments when sensor enclosures are appropriately designed to ensure adequate ventilation and air exchange, thereby preventing moisture accumulation. The observations obtained provide valuable inputs for developing analytical methodologies and offer actionable insights into the influence of rural land-use practices on climate.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Popoola et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: