Community clinics that distribute HIV self-test kits face a reorder problem in which the only feedback on kit expiry is a lagged, incomplete and inconsistently reported count, so any reorder rule tuned to a single reporting regime will over-stock some clinics and stock out others. the present analysis formulates the reorder decision as a distributionally robust optimisation problem over an ambiguity set of expiry-reporting distributions, and solves it with a tractable convex reformulation that yields a closed-form order-up-to level indexed by a Wasserstein radius. The framework is evaluated in a computed healthcare waste equity setting in which clinics differ in reporting fidelity and in the equity weight attached to unmet testing demand. The analysis derives finite-sample performance guarantees for the robust policy, characterises the equity cost of robustness as a function of the radius, and shows that a radius chosen from the reporting-fidelity distribution dominates both the nominal and the worst-case policies on waste and shortage simultaneously. The contribution is a decision rule that is auditable, requires no distributional assumption on expiry reporting, and makes the trade-off between wasted kits and missed tests an explicit policy parameter rather than an artefact of the reporting system.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mpiana et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: