Rapid diagnostic tests for malaria are deployed in batches whose sensitivity can drift between manufacturing lots, yet allocation models typically assume a fixed and known sensitivity. the present analysis formulates the allocation of a fixed stock of rapid diagnostic tests across clinics as a distributionally robust optimisation problem in which batch sensitivity is uncertain within an ambiguity set, and evaluates the resulting misdiagnosis equity consequences through a replication study. The decision variable is the number of tests allocated to each clinic; the objective minimises the worst-case expected number of missed malaria cases subject to an equity constraint on the maximum clinic-level misdiagnosis rate. The ambiguity set is a Wasserstein ball around an empirical sensitivity distribution, and the robust counterpart is reformulated as a tractable linear program. A replication study with 2,000 replications per design cell evaluated the operating characteristics of the allocation rule under a before-after-control-impact design with an intraclass correlation of 0.64, between-cluster standard deviation of 6.0 and residual standard deviation of 4.5. The analysis characterised power across cluster counts of 8, 16, 24 and 32 and effect sizes of 3, 5 and 8 percentage points, and identified 52 clusters as the number required for 80% power at a 5 percentage point effect. The contribution is a tractable robust allocation model and a design-characterisation of the evaluation that would be needed to detect its equity effects.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mphahlele et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: