Malaria rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) are the front-line confirmation tool for febrile illness in district clinics, yet their lot-to-lot variability in limit of detection is rarely propagated into the calibration of point-of-care artificial intelligence (AI) triage models that decide antibiotic prescribing. The framework is formalised as a bounded excess-risk decomposition in which the antibiotic overprescription rate is expressed as a function of the sensitivity and specificity of the RDT lot, the calibration slope of the triage model, and the prevalence of non-malarial bacterial illness. A design-based evaluation of the before-after-control-impact estimator used to audit overprescription is then characterised under a declared variance structure (between-cluster SD = 6.0, residual SD = 4.5, intraclass correlation = 0.64), with power estimated across 2000 replications per design cell for cluster counts of 8, 16, 24 and 32 and effect sizes of 3, 5 and 8 percentage points. The analysis indicates that 54 clusters are required to detect a 5-percentage-point reduction in overprescription at 80% power, and that lot-conditional recalibration of the triage threshold is the mechanism through which calibration transfer can be made safe. The contribution is a formal statement of the conditions under which point-of-care AI triage remains calibrated across RDT lots, and a design-level account of how much evidence is needed to detect the resulting change in prescribing.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Desta et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: