We present a regularised extension of a three-equation depth-averaged model for granular flows recently derived by Deléage et al. (2025 J. Fluid Mech. , vol. 1009, p. A57). The previous model was obtained consistently with the mu left parenthesis upper I right parenthesis μ ( I ) μ (I) -rheology (where mu μ μ denotes the friction coefficient and upper I I I the inertial number), with an asymptotic expansion of the flow variables near a steady uniform flow. However, the range of slope at which steady uniform granular flows can be observed is limited, and the former model cannot be used outside this range, with a possible loss of hyperbolicity, in particular for the liquid/solid and liquid/gas transitions. We present in this paper an extension of the three-equation model, which is valid for any value of the slope. In order to achieve this, we introduce a regularisation coefficient enabling us to model a transition between various flow regimes. This coefficient is written in a way that preserves the consistency with the mu left parenthesis upper I right parenthesis μ ( I ) μ (I) -rheology in the range of slope admitting steady uniform flows. Outside this range, the model keeps a well-posed hyperbolic structure. The predictions of the regularised model are then validated through comparisons with experimental data in various unsteady and non-uniform regimes. We first study dry fronts, and show that the model successfully predicts the flattening of the profiles when the Froude number increases, while keeping a well-defined front. We then show that the model provides accurate results for the final deposit left after a dam break on low-inclination slopes. Another validation is performed on steep slopes. The regularisation procedure is also discussed. Finally, we reproduce the retrogressive failure experiment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Deléage et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: