Does geographic altitude amplify home-court advantage in NCAA men's basketball? Using roughly 195,000 team-game observations from nearly 100,000 games over 2005–2025, I show that programs at 5,000 ft enjoy about 2.0 additional points of home advantage relative to sea-level programs, driven primarily by shooting efficiency. A conceptual framework predicts this pattern: altitude raises the marginal cost of effort for visiting teams relative to adapted home teams. Consistent with a differential-adaptation mechanism, the effect is nonlinear and largest above 3,000 ft, and a neutral-site placebo test finds no effect, though the small neutral-site sample limits its power. The point-margin effect translates into a higher home win probability (roughly 6 percentage points at 5,000 ft) and a net gain of about 0.7 wins per season. These findings have implications for tournament design, betting markets, and competitive balance.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
James Kemper (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: