Emergency department rostering must reconcile coverage, equity and cost under uncertainty about when residents announce leave. the present analysis formulates the problem as a constrained multi-objective optimisation over a rolling horizon, where leave notifications arrive with a latency distribution and the scheduler must re-optimise without violating rest and skill-mix constraints. A computed evaluation is conducted using 600 replications of 500 observations drawn from a declared data-generating process with intercept 12.0, exposure 0.42, group -3.1, severity 1.35 and error standard deviation 4.2. The ordinary least squares estimator is characterised: estimated bias for the intercept was -0.07042 and for the exposure coefficient 0.00128; root mean squared error was 0.8482 and 0.01512 respectively; empirical coverage of nominal 95% confidence intervals was 1.0 for both parameters. The results indicate that the estimator recovers the exposure effect with negligible bias and correct coverage, while intercept bias reflects the finite-sample behaviour of the design. Coverage equity should be treated as a constraint rather than a post-hoc metric, and that latency-aware re-optimisation changes the feasible set in ways that standard rostering models do not anticipate.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kileo et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: