The cumulative explained variance criterion and cross-validation are widely used to determine the truncation number in Riemannian functional regression based on a Karhunen–Loève expansion. However, the former may omit low-variance components that are relevant to the response. Cross-validation incorporates response information, but selecting a truncation number large enough to retain higher-order response-relevant components necessarily includes all intervening components, even when some carry no predictive information. Moreover, the truncation number selected by cross-validation may be sensitive to sampling variability and random fold assignments. Motivated by model averaging, this paper proposes a regularized cross-fitted stacking procedure for intrinsic partial functional linear regression (iPLR) with a Riemannian functional predictor and Euclidean covariates. Specifically, iPLR models are fitted using randomly sampled subsets of Riemannian functional principal component (RFPC) indices from a common candidate pool, and their out-of-fold predictions are used as meta-features for a meta-learner, thereby combining predictive information across different RFPC subsets. Simulation studies and a real-data application show that the proposed method generally attains lower prediction errors and more stable performance than methods based on a single truncation number, especially when both lower- and higher-order RFPCs are relevant to the response while some intervening components are not.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: