Industries 4.0 and 5.0 call for engineers who are technically deep, digitally fluent, and entrepreneurially capable, yet engineering education still treats entrepreneurship as elective content reaching only a motivated minority, with accreditation frameworks omitting it as a required graduate attribute. This paper proposes Entrepreneurship as a Service (EaaS), a pedagogical model grounded in service-dominant logic that reframes entrepreneurial development as a continuous institutional service co-created with industry, rather than a course to be delivered. A survey of engineering faculty across 19 countries grounds the model empirically: faculty already teach entrepreneurially and broadly support institution-wide reform, but rate institutional support as their weakest resource, a shortfall most pronounced in the Middle East and North Africa. EaaS responds through five pedagogical layers and a governance layer that moves industry from advisory boards to operational co-design of projects and assessments, offering universities a route from policy ambition to curriculum practice.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Khezami et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: