Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Single-Pilot Operations (SPO) in commercial aviation raise critical safety challenges in complex, time-pressured situations where human expertise is paramount. This study investigates how AI-based Human-Autonomy Teaming (HAT) can support pilot decision-making under high workload, compromised situational awareness, and time pressure. In a high-fidelity Airbus A320 simulator, 22 airline pilots performed a fuel- and time-constrained approach scenario designed to challenge HAT’s operational effectiveness under four conditions: no assistance, on-demand AI, proactive AI, and proactive explainable AI. Workload (NASA-TLX) remained high across conditions, yet decision-making differed markedly. Without assistance, only 20% chose the safest landing option; with on-demand AI, 40%; and with proactive AI (both versions), 100%. Explainable AI yielded the highest scenario comprehension (75%), matching two-crew baseline performance. Proactive systems increased decision and SA related interactions, fostering a collaborative dynamic akin to traditional crew resource management. Thus, the results demonstrate that, in the context of SPO, proactive and explainable AI was associated with crew-level decision performance within the experimental scenario without adding cognitive load. Beyond the aeronautical domain, our results are of interest for the design of cognitive support systems for high-risk domains where teams composed of humans and AI must adapt in real time.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dormoy et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: