This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
Background Polyethylene (PE) wear debris can cause periprosthetic osteolysis and late failure after total hip arthroplasty, but long-term wear behavior of conventional non–cross-linked PE remains unclear. Methods We reviewed 85 consecutive cementless total hip arthroplasties performed between 2002 and 2005 using ArCom non–cross-linked PE liners (Biomet Inc., Warsaw, IN). After excluding 31 hips lost to follow-up and 5 revised hips, 49 hips (45 patients) with ≥20 years of follow-up were analyzed. Femoral head penetration was measured using PolyWare (Draftware Inc., Vevay, IN) by three independent observers. The first postoperative year was defined as the bedding-in phase, and subsequent penetration as the steady-state phase (SSP). Associations between wear and patient, implant, surgical, and clinical factors were assessed. Results The mean Japanese Orthopaedic Association score improved from 39.6 ± 10.6 preoperatively to 84.4 ± 12.9 at 20 years ( P < .001). Osteolysis was observed in 18 hips. Mean bedding-in phase and SSP wear rates were 0.235 ± 0.155 mm/y and 0.031 ± 0.023 mm/y, respectively. SSP wear correlated linearly with postoperative time (R 2 = 0.99). Hips with higher SSP wear (>0.025 mm/y) had higher 20-year Japanese Orthopaedic Association gait ( P = .033), activities of daily living ( P = .018), and total scores ( P = .013). Charnley category A had higher SSP wear than category B ( P = .024), whereas osteolysis did not affect wear rates. Conclusions ArCom conventional PE showed a nearly constant SSP wear rate over 20 years. Exploratory analyses suggested associations with functional status and Charnley category, but not with other patient, implant, or surgical factors.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Watanabe et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: