Objectives: To examine individual, hospital, and community-level determinants of in-hospital mortality—defined as death during the emergency department visit or after hospitalization at the same hospital—among critically ill pediatric emergency patients in South Korea. Methods: We analyzed data from the National Emergency Department Information System, comprising 26,206 pediatric patients (aged ≤18 y, triage levels 1 to 2) at emergency medical centers in 2021, using multilevel logistic regression. The null model confirmed substantial between-hospital [intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC)=0.17] and between-community (ICC=0.01) variation, justifying the multilevel approach. Results: Overall, in-hospital mortality was 2.3%. At the individual level, compared with self-transport, patients arriving by 119 ambulance ( OR =2.73, 95% CI: 1.85-4.05) and private ambulance patients ( OR =3.14, 95% CI: 1.72-5.73) had higher odds. Intentional and unintentional injuries showed 2.06-fold and 2.97-fold higher odds versus noninjury, respectively. Consciousness level showed a dose-response association (coma: OR =228.64). Severe illness was associated with a 4.94-fold higher odds ratio. At the hospital level, higher critically ill proportions were associated with lower mortality (≥10%: OR =0.43), while hospitals with ≥45 combined pediatric and neonatal intensive care beds had higher odds ( OR =2.43), likely reflecting case-mix concentration. At the community level, metropolitan cities showed higher odds ( OR =1.64), while a higher Timely Relevance Index (TRI; percentage of residents accessing care within 60 min) was associated with lower mortality (≥95%: OR =0.55). Conclusions: Pediatric emergency mortality was associated with factors across all 3 levels. Risk-adjusted performance metrics are needed for tiered systems, and timely geographic access supports distributed initial stabilization capacity.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lee et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: