Recycling manure nitrogen (N) can reduce mineral fertilizer inputs, but its effects on soil emissions require evaluation. A 30-day, plant-free incubation compared urea alone (N1), 15% (N2) and 30% (N3) substitution with matured sheep manure, and an unfertilized control (N0). Acidic tea plantation soil (pH 4.24; organic matter 49.4 g kg−1) and manure (pH 7.6) were incubated at 80% water-filled pore space. Cumulative molecular N2O over days 1–30 was 894.1 ± 15.7, 911.5 ± 18.4, 960.4 ± 6.0 and 900.6 ± 13.4 ng g−1 dry soil in N0–N3 (mean ± SE; n = 3). Differences from N1 were 48.9 ng g−1 for N2 (unadjusted 95% confidence interval, 2.8 to 95.1) and −10.9 ng g−1 for N3 (−57.0 to 35.3); neither was significant after Holm adjustment. Cumulative CO2 was higher in N3 (1478.0 μg g−1) than in N1 (950.6 μg g−1). Both substitution treatments increased DNA-normalized AOB amoA and nirS on day 30, after N2O fluxes had declined. AOA amoA and nirK lacked significant treatment × day interactions, and nosZ had no significant planned day-specific contrast. Exploratory SEM and Mantel analyses did not establish microbial drivers: no N2O predictor remained significant after categorical-day adjustment, and no Mantel association survived false-discovery-rate correction. The 30% substitution warrants field evaluation, but laboratory nonsignificance does not establish emission equivalence or agronomic benefit.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhou et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: