This study develops a digital-thread framework for predictive assessment of digital transformation in heavy equipment manufacturing and evaluates it through resource-constrained discrete-event simulation (DES) of the VFP-1600 route. The model represents nine stages, shared engineering capacity, Poisson order releases, data-readiness lags, and first-come-first-served queues. Seven expert rankings yield Kendall’s W = 0.893 and a normalized Digital Maturity Index of 0.264. Maturity priorities guide the activation of stage-level intervention assumptions. Five specified configurations are compared in 10,000 independent annual-cohort replications per load level, using paired random inputs. At six expected releases per year, simulated mean cycle time is 163.35 days for the baseline, 126.70 days for integrated PLM + MES + QMS/IoT, and 119.46 days with APS-associated duration assumptions. At twelve releases, the corresponding means are 213.02, 159.23, and 149.58 days. Directly measured time-average work-in-process is checked against an exact finite-horizon residence-time identity. A joint sensitivity experiment varies nine intervention-realization factors, resource occupation by delays, and arrival intensity. Its 5th–95th percentile ranges of estimated mean cycle-time benefit are 9.0–25.3% and 11.0–28.7%. The computational experiment shows how resource contention changes both the magnitude and uncertainty of projected benefits. The framework supports ex ante comparison of explicitly specified production and transformation scenarios.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Novikov et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: