Background: Short sleep duration is a modifiable barrier to diabetes prevention, yet no adequately powered trials have tested whether integrating a behavioral sleep intervention into a lifestyle intervention improves glycemic or weight loss outcomes in adults with prediabetes. Objective: To compare the effects of a lifestyle versus a lifestyle plus sleep intervention on glucose control and weight loss in adults with prediabetes and habitual short sleep duration. Methods: In this two-arm, parallel-group randomized controlled trial, adults with A1c-confirmed prediabetes and actigraphy-confirmed short sleep duration completed two clinic visits and 2-week at-home monitoring periods, including actigraphy-estimated sleep and continuous glucose monitoring. The 8-week intervention was delivered one-on-one via a Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act-compliant videoconferencing platform. The primary outcome was change in the percentage of time sensor glucose was above tight range (> 140 mg/dL). Secondary outcomes included actigraphy-estimated sleep parameters, self-reported sleep quality and daytime sleepiness, and body weight. We compared pre- to post-intervention changes between groups using a modified intention-to-treat approach. Results: Among 196 participants, we found no significant between-group difference in the primary glucose outcome. Both groups achieved significant within-group increases in sleep and reductions in body weight, with no significant between-group differences for either outcome. The lifestyle plus sleep group showed significantly greater improvements in self-reported sleep quality and daytime sleepiness compared to the lifestyle group. Sleep onset advanced significantly only in lifestyle plus sleep group, though the between-group difference did not reach statistical significance. A post hoc analysis found that earlier sleep onset, regardless of group assignment, was independently associated with greater weight loss, whereas changes in sleep duration were not. Discussion: Adding a behavioral sleep intervention to a lifestyle intervention did not improve glucose control. However, advancing sleep onset time predicted greater weight loss, independent of sleep duration or group assignment, identifying circadian timing as a promising and modifiable target for diabetes prevention. Prospective trials powered to test sleep timing interventions on metabolic outcomes are warranted.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Malone et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: