Key result
Colchicine shows similar efficacy to non-colchicine regimens for traumatic pericarditis, with zero therapy escalations in both groups.
Why the study?
Limited data exist describing optimal treatment of pericarditis after acute blunt or penetrating trauma, and standard anti-inflammatory drugs, colchicine, or corticosteroids may not be feasible due to concomitant injuries.
Does colchicine-based therapy prevent therapy escalation compared to non-colchicine treatment in patients with traumatic pericarditis?
Observational (n=11)
No
Does colchicine-based therapy prevent therapy escalation compared to non-colchicine treatment in patients with traumatic pericarditis?
Absolute Event Rate: 0% vs 0%
In this small retrospective case series of 11 patients with traumatic pericarditis, neither colchicine-based therapy nor non-colchicine management resulted in therapy escalation, though treatment intolerances like AKI and GI bleed were observed in both groups.
Supports colchicine tolerability in traumatic pericarditis; hypothesis-generating and requires randomized confirmation.
Limited data exist describing the optimal treatment of pericarditis after acute blunt or penetrating trauma. Treatment with high-dose nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAID), colchicine, or corticosteroids may not be feasible due to concomitant injuries. This was a retrospective, single-center, descriptive case series at a large, academic, Level 1 Trauma Center over a 10-year period. Patients admitted to the trauma service with a diagnosis of pericarditis at any point during index admission were eligible for inclusion. Groups were defined as colchicine-based treatment (monotherapy or combination) and any therapy besides colchicine, including no medications (surgical). The primary endpoint was therapy escalation defined as treatment modification, chart note documenting therapy failure, rehospitalization, repeat pericardial surgical intervention, or documentation of recurrent pericarditis. Secondary outcomes were treatment intolerance documented in a chart note including gastrointestinal bleed (GIB) and acute kidney injury (AKI). Eleven patients with traumatic pericarditis were included. Four (36%) patients received colchicine-based therapy: monotherapy (2, [50%]) or combination with NSAID (2, [50%]). Seven (63%) patients received non-colchicine treatment: 2 (29%) NSAID alone; 5 (71%) surgical management without medication. There were no occurrences of therapy escalation in either group. Treatment intolerances occurred in 1 (25%; AKI) patient in the colchicine group and 3 (43%; AKI, 2 [29%], GIB, 1 [14%]) patients in the non-colchicine group. Pericarditis is a rare complication after trauma, and no patients in this case series demonstrated treatment escalation. Additional, larger sample studies are necessary to guide optimal treatment in this uncommon but important population.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bollinger et al. (2026) conducted an observational in Traumatic pericarditis (n=11). Colchicine-based treatment (monotherapy or combination with NSAID) vs. Non-colchicine treatment (NSAID alone or surgical management without medication) was evaluated on Therapy escalation (treatment modification, chart note documenting therapy failure, rehospitalization, repeat pericardial surgical intervention, or documentation of recurrent pericarditis). Colchicine-based therapy and non-colchicine treatments both resulted in 0% therapy escalation in 11 patients with traumatic pericarditis, with treatment intolerance in 25% vs 43%.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: